Friday, June 16, 2006

C...ya C?

Chemistry ......or comfort? What matters most in a relationship?

22 comments:

Pritika Gupta said...

comfort..

Viky said...

I think both complement each other.

endevourme said...

so here is the weekly question!
but u r giving options...?
i think both.
no chance of missing ;-)

Khushi said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
u_know_me said...

comfortable chemistry :)

Jay said...

Can you have "chemistry" with somone you are not "comfortable"?

Khushi said...

If you are comfortable with someone, physics, chemistry, biology, economics,history all follows :D :P

Shruthi said...

Yay! The question of the week! :D

To answer Jay, YES, you can have chemistry with someone you are not comfortable :)

And I agree with Viky, both complement each other initially. But in the long, long, long run - comfort wins hands down. - (I think) :)

Jay said...

@Shruthi,

Was just wondering, how is that possible?

Viky said...

@Jay: It is the kind of chemistry which explodes every now and then. :D

Ashma said...

If you have chemistry with the person, u will be comfortable with each other. I guess both come in a package.. though the level of comfort/chemistry may vary.. :)

Kiran said...

i quite agree with jay here.. one cannot have a chemistry without be4ing comfy with the person..i guess what u guys mean here is something like a spark or a crush, which is not chemistry in a relationship accord to me.. i guess its better we define our perspectives of what the words stand for b4 we continue..

Avinash said...

Both to some extent. But Chitra (ie, read it as 'you'.. ;)..) is most important.. :)

Kiran said...

i really feel that they r not isolated feelings that are comparible..only if u have comfort, can u have a chemistry..so to me the blog itself doesnt make much sense..

Shruthi said...

For all those who asked me how can you have chemistry without comfort:
I equate comfort with peace and security. You can have tremendous chemistry with someone, yet remain disturbed and uneasy.
For a relationship to work, along with chemistry, there must be comfort. And only comfort might work, but it will be pretty dull.
You need both in equal measure, at least in the beginning.

chitra said...

Chemistry : Why do we all hv to take as complementary. As you all know some (acid) when combined wih bases give a different reacion and some form good mixtures. The concept of solvent , solute wouldnt have come.

So, it depends on the nature of the two, good reaction. i think in other words, good comfort level leads to ood chemistry!

thankk god didnt see your post in the morning and i wd have been therown out of my job!
sorry for the lengthy comment!

angada said...

Finally, another weekly question.

Instead of saying, "I think YOU need both", I prefer to say, "I think I need both in any relationship!"

Grandebelf said...

it has to one is it? gen how will u hv comfort if there is no chemistry?

Sujit said...

relation ship can be either enemity or aminity. So, if its enemiety that you can still be comfortable with the relationship without chemistry!.. otherwise it si necessary to have it!.. chemistry need not always be the same way of understanding things.. they can be different also.. disagrement also!.. but still you can be comfortable.. since they haven't offende your or your opinion of thought!!..

chitra said...

-/Pritika
In the long run, yup :)!

-/Viky, Endevourme, u_know_me
Complementary? Not really....

-/Shruthi
Really...the list of commonalities simply groweth.. :D!

-/Jay
Shruthi's said it :)!

-/Kiran
Pity I was not born intelligent to know this beforehand... :)

-/Sujit, Ashma, Namesake
Tee hee..that's the word 'offence'! Comfort does not involve this at all....

-/Avi
Neenu saha.... :)

-/Angada
Right..a bit of that...and a bit of this.... :D!

Avinash said...

well, I meant the people in it.. Didn't point at YOU in particular. Just wanted to use the first letter of your name to convey a much bigger meaning.. :).

chitra said...

-/Avi
Hyuck hyuck..."C, C ya C?"